About
Issues
Our authors 
Library
Contact us
Forum
 
Rulina T. K., Bakshutova E. V. (2018). Methodological resource of categorical analysis of group consciousness

<< To the contents of the issue

JournalMethodology and History of Psychology Year2018 Issue3 Pages62–71
SectionMethodological Problems of Psychology TypeScientific article DOI10.7868/S1819265318030044
CitationRulina T. K., Bakshutova E. V. (2018). Metodologičeskij resurs kategorial'nogo analiza gruppovogo soznaniâ [Methodological resource of categorical analysis of group consciousness] // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Iss. 3. P. 62–71.




Methodological Resource of Categorical Analysis
of Group Consciousness


The article presents methodological approaches to the identification and analysis of the basic categories that determine the structure and field of the values of group consciousness, which not only specify a reliable idea of its qualitative characteristics, but also allow us to identify differences in its sign forms by predicting scenarios for the evolution of group categories. The authors substantiate the idea of an associative-verbal network of a category whose thesaurus is a form of transformation of the world of a linguistic personality in the context of a new perspective of cognitive models of the consciousness of a large social group. The subject-matter of the probabilistic approach to the language networks of the group is, according to the authors, the processes of variability, development, production of categorical-associative phenomena of group consciousness, as well as scenarios of the facilitation, memorial, preventive nature of cognitive influences on group consciousness.

Keywords: group consciousness; group thinking; collective subject; associative-verbal network (AVN); basic categories; concept; practical concept


References
  • Bad'û A. (2004). Delez. Šum bytiâ. M.: Fond naučnyh issledovanij "Pragmatika kul'tury"; Logos-Al'tera; Esse homo.
  • Bakšutova E. V., Rulina T. K. (2015). Prototipy, tropizmy i novacii âzykovogo podsoznaniâ bol'ših grupp // Azimut naučnyh issledovanij. № 3 (12). S. 39–43.
  • Bibihin V. V. (1994–1996). Kurs lekcij "Vitgenštejn", MGU im. M. V. Lomonosova. Lekciâ 20. URL: https://www.facebook.com/bibikhin/?fref=ts
  • Collingwood R. (1940). An Essay on Metaphysics. Oxford.
  • Deese J. (1965). The structure of associations in Language and thought. Baltimore.
  • Èpštejn M. N. (2016). Ot znaniâ – k tvorčestvu. Kak gumanitarnye nauki mogut izmenât' mir. M.; SPb.: Centr gumanitarnyh iniciativ.
  • Fuko M. (1999). Slova i veŝi. Arheologiâ gumanitarnyh nauk. M.: Ad Marginem.
  • Goroško E. I. (2001). Integrativnaâ model' svobodnogo associativnogo èksperimenta. M.: IÂ RAN; Har'kov: RA Karavella.
  • Hal'bvaks M. (2007). Social'nye ramki pamâti. M.: Novoe izdatel'stvo.
  • Karaulov Û. N. (1999). Associativnaâ grammatika i associativno-verbal'naâ set'. M.: IRÂ RAN.
  • Kubrâkova E. S. (1995). Èvolûciâ lingvističeskih idej vo vtoroj polovine XX veka // Âzyk i nauka konca XX veka. M.: RGGU. S. 144–238.
  • Lakoff Dž. (1996). Kognitivnoe modelirovanie. Âzyk i intellekt. M.: Progress.
  • Lektorskij V. A. (2010). Subʺekt v istorii filosofii: problemy i dostiženiâ // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. T. 5. Vyp. 1. S. 5–18.
  • Livia H. (1997). Queerly Phrased. Oxford: University Press.
  • Markovina I. Û., Danilova E. V. (2000). Specifika associativnogo soznaniâ russkih i amerikancev: opyt postroeniâ "associativnogo geštal'ta" tekstov originala i perevoda // Âzykovoe soznanie i obraz mira / otv. red. N. V. Ufimceva. M.: I RAN. S. 116–132.
  • Pinker S. (2004). Âzyk kak instinkt. M.: Editorial URSS.
  • Popova Z. D., Sternin I. A. (2007). Kognitivnaâ lingvistika. M.: AST Vostok–Zapad.
  • Rosch E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch, B. B. Lloyd (Eds.), Cognition and categorization. Hillsdale; New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum associates. P. 27–48.
  • Roždestvenskaâ E. Û. (2012). Biografičeskij metod v sociologii. M.: Izdatel'skij dom VŠÈ.
  • Rulina T. K., Bakšutova E. V. (2016). Kategorial'nye koncepty âzykovogo podsoznaniâ bol'ših social'nyh grupp // Mir psihologii. № 2. S. 191–199.
  • Rulina T. K., Bakšutova E. V., Bezuglov A. V. (2016). Ustojčivost' i izmenčivost' kategorial'nyh programm soznaniâ bol'ših social'nyh grupp: religioznyj aspekt // Materialy Vserossijskogo cerkovno-gosudarstvennogo foruma "Nasledniki pobeditelej" 21–24 maâ 2015 g. Samara. S. 89–95.
  • Rulina T. K., Bakšutova E. V., Ihsanova S. G. (2014). Kategorial'no-associativnaâ sistema religioznogo soznaniâ pravoslavnyh hristian // European Social Science Journal = Evropejskij žurnal social'nyh nauk. № 10. T. 2 (49). S. 516–525.
  • Sobčik L. N. (1998). Test vos'mi vlečenij Sondi i ego modifikaciâ. Vvedenie v psihologiû individual'nosti. M.: Institut prikladnoj psihologii.
  • Znakov V. V. (2007). Samosoznanie, samoponimanie i ponimaûŝee sebâ bytie // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. T. 2. Vyp. 3. S. 65–74.

| Версия для печати |
© 2022 Methodology and History of Psychology