About
Issues
Our authors 
Library
Contact us
Forum
 
Balin V. D., Stepanova Yu. V. (2018). L. M. Vekker and the Saint-Petersburg psychological school

<< To the contents of the issue

JournalMethodology and History of Psychology Year2018 Issue4 Pages17–33
SectionThe Scientific Heritage of L. M. Vekker TypeScientific article DOI10.7868/S1819265318040027
CitationBalin V. D., Stepanova Yu. V. (2018). L. M. Vekker i Sankt‑Peterburgskaâ psihologičeskaâ škola [L. M. Vekker and the Saint-Petersburg psychological school] // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Iss. 4. P. 17–33.




L. M. Vekker and the Saint-Petersburg Psychological School


The article is devoted to the role and place of L. M. Vekker in the activities of the Saint-Petersburg scientific-psychological school. The features of such school are described: evolutionism, psychologism, methodological load, complexity-systematicity, empirical orientation, the tendency to the natural-scientific paradigm. The problems solved by the school are listed, in particular: the problem of psychogenesis, the study of bilateral asymmetry, the study of energy-information relationships, the study of the relationship between different forms of activation, typological studies and neurodynamics, the study of sensory systems, the search for psychological invariants, mathematical psychology, etc. It shows which problems L. M. Vekker developed in his work at the Faculty of Psychology of Saint-Petersburg State University. He built a general theory of mental processes, based his concept and model of psychic perception. When creating the general psychological construction of the psyche, he suggested taking physics as the starting point, because it is the most developed natural-scientific discipline. This work must begin with the creation of measurement units, which are well represented in physics. When developing the general psychology concept of the psyche, he drew attention to the fact that it is necessary to build this construction on the basis of the norm, it is necessary to develop the concept of a normal psyche, but not to prolong the data received on the sick psyche to the norm one, as it's often done. The name of L. M. Vekker is associated by lots of psychologists with the idea of the existence of a geometric invariants hierarchy, borrowed from topology and applied to describe the stages of the formation of mental images. Lev Markovich made the great contribution to the development of the natural-scientific paradigm developed by Leningrad psychologists in the 1950–70s of the 20th century and considered as the basis of the general psychological constructions of other psychologists of this school.

Keywords: natural-scientific paradigm; Leningrad (Saint-Petersburg) psychological school; unified theory of mental processes; geometric invariants; energy-information relationships


References
  • Adrianov O. S. (1976). O principah organizacii integrativnoj deâtel'nosti mozga. M.: Medicina.
  • Akinŝikova G. I. (1969). Telosloženie i reaktivnost' organizma čeloveka. L.: Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta.
  • Akinŝikova G. I. (1977). Somatičeskaâ i psihofiziologičeskaâ organizaciâ čeloveka. L.: Izd-vo LGU.
  • Anan'ev B. G. (2001). O problemah sovremennogo čelovekoznaniâ. SPb.: Piter.
  • Arbib M. (1976). Metaforičeskij mozg. M.: Mir.
  • Balin V. D. (2001). Psihičeskoe otraženie. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU.
  • Balin V. D. (2017). Teoretičeskaâ psihologiâ. M.: Ûrajt.
  • Bèkon F. (1971). Sočineniâ v 2 t. T. 1. O dostoinstve i priumnoženii nauk. M.: Mysl'.
  • Dejč S. (1970). Modeli nervnoj sistemy. M.: Mir.
  • Ganzen V. A. (1984). Sistemnye opisaniâ v psihologii. L.: Izd-vo LGU.
  • Grodinz F. (1966). Teoriâ regulirovaniâ i biologičeskie sistemy. M.: Mir.
  • Gurevič G. B. (1948). Osnovy teorii algebraičeskih invariantov. M.; L.: Gos. izd-vo tehniko-teoretičeskoj literatury.
  • Hol'st È., Oppel't V., Henzel G. (1960). Processy regulirovaniâ v biologii. M.: IIL.
  • Ignatov V. A. (1979). Teoriâ informacii i peredači signalov. M.: Sovetskoe radio.
  • Kulešova L. N. (1975). Vkusovye pokazateli pri različnyh funkcional'nyh sostoâniâh organizma // Vestnik LGU. N 3. S. 150–153.
  • Kulešova L. N. (1983). K issledovaniû obraznoj pamâti vkusovoj modal'nosti // Kategorii, principy i metody psihologii. Psihičeskie processy. Tezisy naučnyh soobŝenij sovetskih psihologov k VI Vsesoûznomu sʺezdu Obŝestva psihologov SSSR. M. S. 454–455.
  • Kulešova L. N. (1985). Zavisimost' nadežnosti prognoza degustacionnogo analiza ot tipa urovnevyh i strukturnyh harakteristik vkusovoj čuvstvitel'nosti // Učenye zapiski Tartuskogo universiteta. Vyp. 722. Problemy psihologii vospriâtiâ i myšleniâ. Tartu. S. 97–105.
  • Kulešova L. N. (1997). Sensorno-perceptivnaâ organizaciâ v strukture psihologičeskih harakteristik čeloveka // Izvestiâ Akademii pedagogičeskih i social'nyh nauk. Vyp. 2. S. 50–56.
  • Larsen R. J., Buss D. M. (2008). Personality Psychology. 3 ed. McGraw Hill.
  • Levčenko E. V. (2003). Istoriâ i teoriâ psihologii otnošenij. SPb.: Aletejâ.
  • Libin A. V., Libina A. V. (2008). Logika izučeniâ prirodnyh osnov psihičeskoj real'nosti: teoriâ mental'noj ierarhii L. M. Vekkera) // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Vyp. 4. S. 101–108.
  • Loginova N. A. (2005). Opyt čelovekoznaniâ: istoriâ kompleksnogo podhoda v psihologičeskih školah V. M. Behtereva i B. G. Anan'eva. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU.
  • Loginova N. A. (2016). Antropologičeskaâ psihologiâ Borisa Anan'eva. M.: Institut psihologii RAN.
  • Luk A. N. (1966). Pamât' i kibernetika. M.: Nauka.
  • Marcinkovskaâ T. D., Ûrevič A. V. (2007). Estestvenno-naučnaâ i gumanitarnaâ paradigmy v psihologii: Konfrontaciâ ili…? // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Vyp. 2. S. 161–169.
  • Mâsiŝev V. N. (2004). Psihologiâ otnošenij. Voronež: MODÈK; M.: Moskovskij psihologo-social'nyj institut.
  • Osorina M. V. (2008). Naučnoe tvorčestvo i sud'ba L'va Markoviča Vekkera (K 90-letiû so dnâ roždeniâ) // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Vyp. 4. S. 85–100.
  • Pirs Dž. (1967). Simvoly, signaly, šumy. Zakonomernosti i processy peredači informacii. M.: Mir.
  • Pribram K. (1975). Âzyki mozga. M.: Progress.
  • Psihodiagnostičeskie metody (v kompleksnom longitûdnom issledovanii studentov) (1976) / pod red. A. A. Bodaleva, M. D. Dvorâšinoj, I. M. Paleâ. L.: LGU.
  • Rozenblatt F. (1965). Principy nejrodinamiki. Perceptrony i teoriâ mehanizmov mozga. M.: Mir.
  • Suhodol'skij G. V. (1997). Matematičeskaâ psihologiâ. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU.
  • Suhodol'skij G. V. (1998). Vvedenie v matematiko-psihologičeskuû teoriû deâtel'nosti. SPb.: Izd-vo SPbGU.
  • Tejâr de Šarden P. (1987). Fenomen čeloveka. M.: Nauka.
  • Tihonova È. V. (2010). U istokov sozdaniâ školy filosofskoj psihologii v Sankt-Peterburgskom universitete: Mihail Ivanovič Vladislavlev // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Vyp. 2. S. 100–114.
  • Umrihin V. V. (2007). Istoriko-metodologičeskie problemy analiza naučnyh škol v psihologii // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Vyp. 4. S. 5–14.
  • Vejl' G. (1947). Klassičeskie gruppy, ih invarianty i predstavlenie. M.: Gos. IIL.
  • Vekker L. M. (1964). Vospriâtie i osnova ego modelirovaniâ. L.: Izd-vo Leningradskogo un-ta
  • Vekker L. M. (1998). Psihika i real'nost': edinaâ teoriâ psihičeskih processov. M.: Smysl.
  • Vekker L. M. (2000). Mir psihičeskoj real'nosti: struktura, processy i mehanizmy. M.: Russkij mir.
  • Viner N. (1968). Kibernetika, ili upravlenie i svâz' v životnom i mašine. 2 izd. M.: Sovetskoe radio.

| Версия для печати |
© 2020 Methodology and History of Psychology