About
Issues
Ourauthors
Library
Contact us
Forum
 
Yanchuk V. A. (2018). Cultural-dialogical metaperspective of psychological knowledge integration

<< To the contents of the issue

JournalMethodology and History of Psychology Year2018 Issue1 Pages124–154
SectionConstruction of Psychology Subject-Matter TypeScientific article DOI10.7868/S1819265318010089
CitationYanchuk V. A. (2018). Kul'turno-dialogičeskaâ metaperspektiva integracii psihologii v usloviâh neopredelennosti i konstruktivistskogo mnogoobraziâ [Cultural-dialogical metaperspective of psychological knowledge integration in conditions of uncertainty and constructivist diversity] // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Iss. 1. P. 124–154.




Cultural-Dialogical Metaperspective of Psychological Knowledge Integration
in Conditions of Uncertainty and Constructivist Diversity


The problem of finding theoretical and empirical grounds for integrating psychological knowledge in the context of cultural-dialogic interdeterministic metatheory is presented. The idea of four-dimensional continuity of psychological phenomenology is grounded, the system-forming universal basis of which is culture in the aspect of the psychic reality cultural construction. Heteroqualitative, multidimensional and multi-paradigmal psychological knowledge is represented in the form of three four-dimensional continuums. In accordance with the introduced principle of cultural-dialogic interdeterminism, the interdeterministic character of the interaction of the constituent structural elements. Theoretical and empirical substantiations of innovative approach are given.

Keywords: cultural constructivism; cultural-scientific tradition; culture; dialogical interdetermination; heterogeneous system; integration; metatheory; methodology; principle of cultural-dialogical interdeterminism; cultural-dialogical interdeterminist approach; four-dimensional continuums of psychological phenomenology


References
  • Asmolov A. G. (2008). Istoriko-èvolûcionnaâ paradigma konstruirovaniâ raznoobraziâ mirov: deâtel'nost' kak suŝestvovanie [The historical and evolutionary paradigm of constructing the diversity of the worlds: activity as an existence] // Voprosy psihologii. N 5. P. 3–11.
  • Asmolov A. G. (2012). Krizisy psihologii v setevom stoletii (vystuplenie na V sʺezde RPO) [Crises of psychology in the network century (speech at the 5th Congress of the RPS)] // Rossijskij psihologičeskij žurnal. Vol. 9 (1). P. 7–11.
  • Asmolov A. G. (2017). Psihologiâ sovremennosti: vyzovy neopredelennosti, složnosti i raznoobraziâ [The psychology of modernity: the challenges of uncertainty, complexity and diversity] // Ot istokov k sovremennosti: 130 let Moskovskomu psihologičeskomu obŝestvu: mat-ly ûbilejnoj konf.: Vol. 6 / Ed. by D. B. Bogoyavlenskaya. Moscow: Kogito-Centr. P. 79–95.
  • Bakhtin M. M. (1986). K metodologii gumanitarnyh nauk [Toward a methodology for the human sciences] // Èstetika slovesnogo tvorčestva [The Aesthetics of Verbal Art]. Moscow: Iskusstvo.
  • Bakhtin M. M. (1986). Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
  • Bandura A. (1978). The self-system in reciprocal determinism // American Psychologist, 33 (4), 345–358.
  • Bibler V. S. (1991). Ot naukoučeniâ – k logike kul'tury: dva filosofskih vvedeniâ v dvadcat' pervyj vek [From the Science of Knowledge to the Logic of Culture: Two Philosophical Introductions to the Twenty-first Century]. Moscow: Politizdat.
  • Bohannon J. (2015). Many psychological papers fail replication test // Science, 349 (6251), 910–911.
  • Boss M. (1983). The Existential Foundations of Medicine and Psychology. New York: Jason Aronson.
  • Brinkmann S. (2011). Towards an expansive hybrid psychology: Integrating theories of the mediated mind // IPBS: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 45, 1–20.
  • Cole M. (2010). Vygotsky and context: Toward a resolution of theoretical disputes // The Sociocultural Turn in Psychology: The Contextual Emergence of Mind and Self. New York: Columbia University Press. P. 253–280.
  • Crumley C. (Ed.). (1994). Historical Ecology: Cultural Knowledge and Changing Landscapes. Santa Fe, New Mexico: School of American Research Press.
  • de Jong H. (2000). Genetic determinism. How not to interpret behavioral genetics // Theory & Psychology, 10 (5), 615–637.
  • Earp B. D., Trafimow D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology // Frontiers in Psychology, 6.
  • Edwards M. (2010). Organizational Transformation for Sustainability: An Integral Metatheory. New York: Routledge.
  • Ellis B. D., Stam H. J. (2015). Crisis? What crisis? Cross-cultural psychology's appropriation of cultural psychology // Culture & Psychology, 21 (3), 293–317.
  • Fogel A., Lyra C. D. P., Valsiner J. (Eds.). (1997). Dynamics and Indeterminism in Developmental and Social Processes. New York: Psychology Press.
  • Funder D. (2016). Taking situations seriously: The situation construal model and the riverside situational Q-sort // Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25 (3), 203–208.
  • Gelfand N. G., Chiu Chi-yue, Hong Ying-yi. (2011). Advances in Culture and Psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gelfand N. G., Chiu Chi-yue, Hong Ying-yi. (2012). Advances in Culture and Psychology. Vol. 2. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gelfand N. G., Chiu Chi-yue, Hong Ying-yi. (2013). Advances in Culture and Psychology. Vol. 3. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gelfand N. G., Chiu Chi-yue, Hong Ying-yi. (2014). Advances in Culture and Psychology. Vol. 4. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Gergen K. (2010). The acculturated brain // Theory & Psychology, 20 (6), 795–816.
  • Goli Z. (2014). Sravnenie predstavlenij, koping-strategij i sposobov regulirovaniâ boli u iranskih i belorusskih pacientov, ispytyvaûŝih hroničeskuû bol' [Comparison of views, coping strategies and methods of pain management in Iranian and Belarusian patients experiencing chronic pain]. Dissertation. Minsk: BGU.
  • Goli Z., Yanchuk V. A. (2012). Effect of racial and ethnical differences in pain perception: Explaining the effective mechanisms on it // Psihologičeskij žurnal. N 3–4. P. 41–49.
  • Goli Z., Yanchuk V. A., Torkaman Z. (2015). Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Russian version of the Pain Beliefs and Perceptions Inventory (R-PBPI) in patients with chronic pain // Current Psychology, 34 (4), 772–780.
  • Hart J. (2014). Toward an integrative theory of psychological defense // Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9 (1), 19–39.
  • Healy P. (2012). Toward an integrative, pluralistic psychology: On the hermeneutico-dialogical conditions of the possibility for overcoming fragmentation // New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 271–280.
  • Henriques G. (2008). The problem of psychology and the integration of human knowledge: Contrasting Wilson's consilience with the tree of knowledge system // Theory & Psychology, 18 (6), 731–755.
  • Junne F., Zipfel S. (2015). Research prospects in BioPsychoSocial medicine: New year reflections on the "Cross-Border Dialogue" paradigm // BioPsychoSocial Medicine, 9 (10), 1–4.
  • Keith K. (Ed.). (2011). Cross-Cultural Psychology: Contemporary Themes and Perspectives. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Kitayama S., Salvador C. E. (2017). Culture embrained: Going beyond the nature-nurture dichotomy // Perspectives on Psychological Science. Vol. 12 (5), 841–854.
  • Lane R. D. (2014). Is it possible to bridge the Biopsychosocial and Biomedical models? // BioPsychoSocial Medicine, Vol. 8 (3), 1–3.
  • Leontiev D. A. (2013). O nekotoryh aspektah problemy kul'tura i ličnost' [On some aspects of the problem of "culture and personality"] / Kul'turno-istoričeskaâ psihologiâ. N 1. P. 22–31.
  • Leontiev D. A., Mospan A. N. (2017). Kartina mira, mirovozzrenie i opredelenie neopredelennogo [The picture of the world, the worldview and the definition of the indefinite] // Mir psihologii. N 2. P. 12–19.
  • Lilienfeld S. (2017). Psychology's replication crisis and the grant culture: Righting the ship // Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12 (4), 660–664.
  • Marsh H. W., Graven R. G. (2006). Reciprocal effects of self-concept and performance from a multidimensional perspective // Perspective on Psychological Science, 1 (2), 133–263.
  • Mazur L. B., Watzlawik M. (2016). Debates about the scientific status of psychology: Looking at the bright side // IPBS: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50 (4), 555–567.
  • Mininni G. (2010). The method of dialogue: Transaction Through Interaction // IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 44 (1), 23–29.
  • Patil P., Peng R. D., Leek J. T. (2016). What should researchers expect when they replicate studies? A statistical view of replicability in psychological science // Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11 (4), 539–544.
  • Petrenko V. F. (2010). Paradigma konstruktivizma v gumanitarnyh naukah [The constructivist paradigm in humanities] // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Iss. 3. P. 5–12.
  • Petrenko V. F. (2016). Perspektivy razvitiâ psihologičeskoj školy Vygotskogo–Leont'eva–Lurii v kontekste problematiki psihosemantiki bessoznatel'nogo [Prospects for the development of the Vygotsky–Leontiev–Luria psychological school in the context of the psychosemantics of the unconscious] // Mir psihologii. N 4. P. 54–67.
  • Powers J. T., Cook J. E., Purdie-Vaughns V., Garcia J., Apfel N., Cohen J. L. (2016). Changing environments by changing individuals: The emergent effects of psychological intervention // Psychological Science, 27 (2), 150–160.
  • Proietto M., Lombardo G. P. (2015). The "crisis" of psychology between fragmentation and integration: The Italian case // Theory & Psychology, 25 (3), 313–327.
  • Rauthnann J. F., Sherman R. A., Funder D. C. (2015). Principles of situation research: Towards a better understanding of psychological situation // European Journal of Personality, 29, 363–381.
  • Salgado J., Clegg J. W. (2011). Dialogism and the psyche: Bakhtin and contemporary psychology // Culture & Psychology, 17 (4), 421–440.
  • Schmidt F. L., Oh I.-S. (2016). The crisis of confidence in research findings in psychology: Is lack of replication the real problem? Or is it something else? // Archives of Scientific Psychology, 4, 32–37.
  • Shotter J. (2001). Toward a third revolution in psychology: from inner mental representations to dialogically structured social practices // Jerome Bruner: Language, Culture, Self / Ed. by D. Bakhurst, S. G. Shanker. P. 167–183.
  • Simão L. M. (2005). Bildung, culture and self // Theory & Psychology, 15 (4), 549–574.
  • Smythe W. E., McKenzie S. A. (2010). A vision of dialogical pluralism in psychology // New Ideas in Psychology, 28 (2), 227–234.
  • Spellman B. (2015). A short (personal) future history of revolution 2.0 // Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10 (6), 886–899.
  • Sripada C., Kessler D., Jonides J. (2016). Sifting signal from noise with replication science // Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11 (4), 576–578.
  • Sternberg R. (2017). Mountain climbing in the dark: Introduction to the special symposium on the future direction of psychological science // Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12 (4), 649–651.
  • Toomela A. (2007). Culture of science: Strange history of the methodological thinking in psychology // IPBS: Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science, 41 (1), 6–20.
  • Turner J. (1990). The misuse and use of metatheory // Sociological Forum. Vol. 5 (1). P. 37–53.
  • Valsiner J, Molenaar C. M., Lyra M., Chaudhary N. (Eds.). (2009). Dynamic Process Methodology in the Social and Developmental Sciences. New York: Springer-Verlag.
  • Valsiner J. (2007). Becoming integrative in science: Re-building contemporary psychology through interdisciplinary and international collaboration // IPBS: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41, 1–5.
  • Valsiner J. (2009). Integrating psychology within the globalizing world: A requiem to the post-modernist experiment with Wissenschaft // IPBS: Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 43, 1–21.
  • Valsiner J. (2014a). An Invitation to Cultural Psychology. New York: SAGE Publications.
  • Valsiner J. (2014b). Needed for cultural psychology: Methodology in a new key // Culture & Psychology, 20 (1), 3–30.
  • van Geert P. (1997). Que sera, sera: Determinism and nonlinear dunemic model building in development // A. Fogel, C. D. P. Lyra, J. Valsiner (Eds.). Dynamics and Indeterminism in Developmental and Social Processes. New York: Psychology Press. P. 13–38.
  • Wallis S. E. (2010). Toward a science of metatheory // Integral Review. A Transdisciplinary and Transcultural Journal For New Thought, Research, and Praxis. Vol. 6. N 3. P. 73–115.
  • Watanabe T. (2010). Metascientific foundations for pluralism in psychology // New Ideas in Psychology, 28 (2), 253–262.
  • Weinstein N., Przybylski A. K., Ryan R. M. (2013). The integrative process: New research and future directions // Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22 (1), 69–74.
  • Wertheimer M. (1912). Experimentelle Studien über das Sehen von Bewegung // Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 61 (1), 161–265.
  • Witherington D. (2007). The dynamic systems approach as metatheory for developmental psychology // Human Development, 50, 127–153.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2000). Metodologiâ, teoriâ i metod v sovremennoj social'noj psihologii i personologii: integrativno-èklektičeskij podhod [Methodology, Theory and Method in Modern Social Psychology and Personology: Integrative-Eclectic Approach]. Minsk: Bestprint.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2003). Psihologiâ postmoderna [Psychology of Postmodern] // Vremâ kak faktor izmenenij ličnosti: sb. nauč. trudov / Ed. by A. V. Brushlinsky, V. A. Polikarpov. Minsk: EGU. P. 175–201.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2005). Vvedenie v sovremennuû social'nuû psihologiû [Introduction to Modern Social Psychology]. Minsk: ASAR.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2006). Postmodernistskij, sociokul'turno-interdeterministskij dialogizm kak perspektiva pozicionirovaniâ v predmete psihologii [Postmodern sociocultural interdeterministic dialogism as a perspective of positioning in the subject-matter of psychology] // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Iss. 1. P. 193–206.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2012). Mežparadigmal'nyj dialog kak resurs uglubleniâ ponimaniâ psihologičeskoj fenomenologii: sociokul'turno-interdeterministskaâ dialogičeskaâ perspektiva [Inter-paradigm dialogue as a resource for deepening understanding of psychological phenomenology: sociocultural-interdeterministic dialogical perspective] // Psihologičeskij žurnal. N 2. P. 4–17.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2013a). Èko-kul'turnaâ obrazovatel'naâ sreda: formirovanie i razvitie. Č. 1: Obrazovanie, nauka i innovacii [Eco-cultural educational environment: formation and development. Part 1: Education, science and innovation] // Adukacyâ i vyhavanne, 1, 60–67.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2013b). Èko-kul'turnaâ obrazovatel'naâ sreda: formirovanie i razvitie. Č. 2: Ot kul'turnoj k mežkul'turnoj kompetentnosti [Eco-cultural educational environment: formation and development. Part 2: From cultural to intercultural competence] // Adukacyâ i vyhavanne, 7, 69–76.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2014). Sociocultural-interdeterminist dialogical perspective of intercultural mutual understanding comprehension deepening // Open Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 2, 178–191.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2014). Sociokul'turno-interdeterministskaâ dialogičeskaâ perspektiva uglubleniâ ponimaniâ mežkul'turnogo vzaimoponimaniâ [Sociocultural-interdeterministic dialogical perspective of deepening understanding of intercultural mutual understanding] // Izvestiâ Saratovskogo universiteta. Novaâ seriâ. Akmeologiâ obrazovaniâ. Psihologiâ razvitiâ. N 3 (11). P. 241–253.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2015a). K postroeniû sociokul'turno-interdeterministskoj dialogičeskoj metateorii integracii psihologičeskogo znaniâ [Towards the construction of a sociocultural-interdeterministic dialogical metatheory of the integration of psychological knowledge] // Ot istokov k sovremennosti: 130 let organizacii psihologičeskogo obŝestva pri Moskovskom universitete: Sb. mat-lov ûbilejnoj konf.: In 5 vols. Vol. 1. Moscow: Kogito-Centr. P. 136–138.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2015b). Četyrehmernyj kontinuum ponimaniâ fenomenologii biopsihosocial'noj adaptacii: sociokul'turno-interdeterministskaâ dialogičeskaâ perspektiva [Four-dimensional continuum of understanding of phenomenology of biopsychosocial adaptation: sociocultural-interdeterministic dialogical perspective] // Materialy IV Meždunar. konf. Psihosocial'naâ adaptaciâ v transformiruûŝemsâ obŝestve. Socializaciâ subʺekta na raznyh ètapah socializacii. Minsk: BGU. P. 530–536.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2016a). Dialogičeskaâ interdeterminaciâ v sisteme četyrehmernyh prostranstv analiza kross-kul'turnoj fenomenologii [Dialogical interdetermination in the system of four-dimensional spaces of the analysis of cross-cultural phenomenology] // Teoretičeskie problemy ètničeskoj i kross-kul'turnoj psihologii: mat-ly V Meždunar. nauč. konf., 27–28 maâ 2016 g. In 2 vols. Vol. 1. Smolensk: SGU. P. 56–63.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2016b). L. S. Vygotskij i kul'turnyj perevorot v psihologii [L. S. Vygotsky and the cultural revolution in psychology] // Psihologičeskij Vademecum: Vitebŝina L. S. Vygotskogo: sb. nauč. statej. Vitebsk: VGU im. P. M. Mašerova. P. 21–33.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2016c). Sociocultural-interdeterminist dialogical metatheory of psychological knowledge integration // International Journal of Psychology, 51, p. 438.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2016d). Sociokul'turno-interdeterministskaâ dialogičeskaâ metateorii integracii psihologičeskogo znaniâ v kontekste problemy social'nogo progressa [Sociocultural-interdeterministic dialogical metatheory of the integration of psychological knowledge in the context of the problem of social progress] // Gumanitarnye osnovaniâ social'nogo progressa: Rossiâ i sovremennost': sb. statej Meždunar. nauč.-prakt. konf. In 8 parts. Pt. 1 / Ed. by V. S. Belgorodsky et al. Moscow: MGUDT. P. 317–324.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2017a). Kul'turno-dialogičeskaâ interdeterministskaâ perspektiva pozicionirovaniâ v problematike razvitiâ ličnosti [Cultural-dialogical interdeterministic perspective of positioning in the problems of personal development] // Aktual'nye problemy psihologii razvitiâ ličnosti: sb. nauč. statej / Ed. by A. V. Rakitskaya, O. G. Mitrofanova. Grodno: GrGU. P. 7–13.
  • Yanchuk V. A. (2017b). Sociokul'turno-interdeterministskaâ dialogičeskaâ metateoriâ integracii psihologičeskogo znaniâ [Sociocultural-interdeterministic dialogical metatheory of the integration of psychological knowledge] // Ot istokov k sovremennosti: 130 let Moskovskomu psihologičeskomu obŝestvu: mat-ly ûbilejnoj konf.: Vol. 6 / Ed. by D. B. Bogoyavlenskaya. Moscow: Kogito-Centr. P. 297–331.
  • Yanchuk V. A., Sapego E. I. (2017). Dialogičeskaâ interdeterminaciâ v psihologičeskoj fenomenologii: primer professional'noj deformacii pedagogov [Dialogical interdetermination in psychological phenomenology: an example of professional deformation of teachers] // Integraciâ obrazovaniâ. N 3. P. 459–476.
  • Yurevich A. V. (1999). Sistemnyj krizis v psihologii [Systemic crisis in psychology] // Voprosy psihologii. N 2. P. 3–11.

|   |
2022 Methodology and History of Psychology