|
Khoziev, V.B. (2007). On question of a place for consulting research method in future paradigm of psychology
Journal |
Methodology and History of Psychology. 2007. Volume 2. Issue 1
|
Section |
In Search of Method of Psychology
|
Pages |
190-206
|
Type |
Scientific article
|
Title |
On question of a place for consulting research method in future paradigm of psychology
|
Authors |
Khoziev, Vadim Borisovich
|
Abstract |
Both the development of the research method in psychology and design of mediation as experimental factor occurred simultaneously. These methodological improvements brought to the psychology implicit manifestation of the principle of the new research, which meant crucial step forward in terms of both subject and method of psychology: mediation may only study in mediation. The article from the standpoint of cultural-historical psychology considers the evolution of the method in psychology. The basis of the method of determination of such an approach is mediation. Advisory method is the logical completion of a certain cycle of development of psychology, most fully and consistently deploying to ward the whole cultural system of means by which it is possible to resolve his most significant of problems.
|
Keywords |
- research method in psychology
- psychological counseling
- planned-gradual formation
- mediation
|
References |
- Бурменская Г.В., Карабанова О.А., Лидерс А.Г., Обухова Л.Ф., Фролов Ю.И. От Выготского к Гальперину. Специальное приложение к "Журналу практического психолога". М., 1996.
- Лазурский А.Ф. Избранные труды по психологии. М., 1997.
- Пузырей А.А. Культурно-историческая теория Л.С. Выготского и современная психология. М., 1986.
- Флейвелл Дж. Генетическая психология Жана Пиаже. М., 1967.
- Хозиев В.Б. Опосредствование в становящейся деятельности. Сургут, 2000.
- Эволюция психотерапии. Т. 1. Семейный портрет в интерьере: семейная терапия. М., 1998.
|
To cite this article |
Khoziev, V.B. (2007). On question of a place for consulting research method in future paradigm of psychology. Methodology and History of Psychology, 2(1), 190-206.
|
|