About
Issues
Our authors 
Contact us
Forum
 
Klochko, V.E. (2007). The logic of the development of psychological knowledge and the problem of the method of science

<< To the contents of the issue

JournalMethodology and History of Psychology Year2007 Volume2 Issue1 Pages5-19
SectionPsychological Cognition and Method of Psychology TypeScientific article Download full text as PDF (in Russian)




The Logic of the Development of Psychological Knowledge and the Problem of the Method of Science


The article states that psychological science enters a phase of its development that allows it to comprehend itself as a self-developing whole and raise questions about the laws of its own development. But the image of science as a closed system, growing "bottom up" in the process of solving specific "puzzles," still prevails. However, even today we can see signs of the formation of the image of science as an open system, the self-development of which appears as a transition of potentiality to reality, initiated by the very fact of openness. The transformation of the method of the science is determined not only by the "bottom," i.e. the way psychological reality opens up in the course of its concrete scientific research, but also by those laws that are inherent in scientific cognition as such. The increase in the level of systemacy of scientific thinking, which makes it possible to distinguish between simple systems, complex self-regulating systems, complex self-developing systems, increases the level of the systematization of psychological thinking, thereby determining the appropriate "upside down" transformations of the subject-matter of science. Today, psychology is trying to understand the role of the psyche in the self-organization of human as an open self-developing system.

Keywords: self-organization; self-development; tendencies of development; progressive development; becoming; laws of becoming; subject-matter of science; method of science; selective interaction; level of systemacy of thinking; classics; non-classics; post-non-classics.


References
  • Agafonov A.Yu. Fenomen soznaniâ v kognitivnoj deâtel'nosti [The Phenomenon of Consciousness in Cognitive Activity]. Doctor of sciences dissertation (abstract). Saint Petersburg, 2006.
  • Bakhtin M.M. Èstetika slovesnogo tvorčestva [The Aesthetics of Verbal Art]. Moscow, 1979.
  • Einstein A. Sobranie naučnyh trudov [Collection of Scientific Works]. Vol. 2. Moscow, 1966.
  • Galazhinsky E.V. Sistemnaâ determinaciâ samorealizacii ličnosti [System Determination of Personality Self-Realization]. Doctor of psychological sciences dissertation. Barnaul, 2002.
  • Klimov E.A. Ob ambiflektornoj prirode psihičeskogo [On the ambiflectory nature of the mental] // Vestnik Moskovskogo un-ta. Ser. 14. "Psihologiâ". 1992. N 1. P. 51-60.
  • Klochko V.E. Iniciaciâ myslitel'noj deâtel'nosti [Initiation of Thinking Activity]. Doctor of sciences dissertation (abstract). Moscow, 1991.
  • Klochko V.E. Čelovek kak psihologičeskaâ sistema [The person as a psychological system] // Sibirskij psihologičeskij žurnal. 1996. N 2. P. 23-27.
  • Klochko V.E. Sistemnaâ determinaciâ myslitel'noj deâtel'nosti na stadii ee iniciacii [Systemic determination of thinking activity at the stage of its initiation] // Sibirskij psihologičeskij žurnal. 1997. N 5. P. 19-27.
  • Klochko V.E. Stanovlenie mnogomernogo mira čeloveka kak suŝnost' ontogeneza [The formation of a multidimensional world of the person as the essence of ontogenesis] // Sibirskij psihologičeskij žurnal. 1998. N 8-9. P. 7-15.
  • Klochko V.E. Samoorganizaciâ v psihologičeskih sistemah: problemy stanovleniâ mental'nogo prostranstva ličnosti (vvedenie v transspektivnyj analiz) [Self-organization in Psychological Systems: Problems of the Formation of the Mental Space of the Person (Introduction to the Transspective Analysis)]. Tomsk, 2005.
  • Klochko V.E., Galazhinsky E.V. Samorealizaciâ ličnosti: sistemnyj vzglâd [Self-realization of the Person: a Systemic View]. Tomsk, 1999.
  • Krasnoryadtseva O.M. Psihologičeskie mehanizmy vozniknoveniâ i regulâcii myšleniâ v real'noj žiznedeâtel'nosti [Psychological Mechanisms of the Initiation and Regulation of Thinking in Everyday Life]. Doctor of psychological sciences dissertation (abstract). Moscow, 1997.
  • Kuhn T. Logika otkrytiâ ili psihologiâ issledovaniâ? [Logic of discovery or psychology of research?] // Filosofiâ nauki. Iss. 3. Problemy analiza znaniâ. Moscow, 1997. P. 20-48.
  • Leontiev A.N. Problema deâtel'nosti v istorii sovetskoj psihologii [The problem of activity in the history of Soviet psychology] // Voprosy psihologii. 1986. N 4. P. 109-120.
  • Leontiev D.A. Neklassičeskij vektor v sovremennoj psihologii [Nonclassical vector in modern psychology] // Postneklassičeskaâ psihologiâ. 2005. N 1.
  • Lomov B.F. Metodologičeskie i teoretičeskie problemy psihologii [Methodological and Theoretical Problems of Psychology]. Moscow, 1984.
  • Mamardashvili M.K. Kak â ponimaû filosofiû [How Do I Understand Philosophy?]. 2nd ed. / Ed. by Yu.P. Senokosov. Moscow, 1992.
  • Nekrasova E.V. Prostranstvenno-vremennaâ organizaciâ žiznennogo mira čeloveka [Spatial-Temporal Organization of the Human Lifeworld]. Doctor of psychological sciences dissertation (abstract). Barnaul, 2005.
  • Popper K. Mir predraspoložennostej [A world of propensities] // Èvolûcionnaâ èpistemologiâ i logika social'nyh nauk. Moscow, 2000.
  • Slobodchikov V.I., Isaev E.I. Antropologičeskij princip v psihologii razvitiâ [Anthropological principle in developmental psychology] // Voprosy psihologii. 1998. N 3. P. 3-17.
  • Smirnov S.D. Čem grozit psihologii otsutstvie obŝeprinâtogo opredeleniâ ee predmeta? [What is bad if we have no common definition of subject-matter of psychology?] // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. 2006. Vol. 1. Iss. 1. P. 73-85.
  • Stepin V.S. Naučnoe poznanie i cennosti tehnogennoj civilizacii [Scientific knowledge and values of technogenic civilization] // Voprosy filosofii. 1989. N 10. P. 3-18.
  • Stepin V.S. Samorazvivaûŝiesâ sistemy i postneklassičeskaâ racional'nost' [Self-developing systems and post-non-classical rationality]. Retrieved from: http://filosof.historic.ru/books/c0026_1.shtml
  • Stepin V.S. Teoretičeskoe znanie: ctruktura, istoričeskaâ èvolûciâ [Theoretical Knowledge: Structure, Historical Evolution]. Moscow, 2000.
  • Strugatsky A., Strugatsky B. Stalker [Screenplay for the film directed by Andrei Tarkovsky]. Retrieved from: http://rusf.ru/abs/
  • Vygotsky L.S. Istoričeskij smysl psihologičeskogo krizisa [Historical meaning of the crisis in psychology] // Sobranie sočinenij. Vol. 1. Moscow, 1982. P. 291-436.
  • Yaroshevsky M.G. K istorii form psihologičeskogo poznaniâ [On the history of forms of psychological knowledge] // Voprosy psihologii. 1981. N 3. P. 137-145.
  • Yurevich A.V. Sistemnyj krizis v psihologii [Systemic crisis in psychology] // Voprosy psihologii. 1999. N 2. P. 3-11.

To cite this article: Klochko, V.E. (2007). The logic of the development of psychological knowledge and the problem of the method of science. Methodology and History of Psychology, 2(1), 5-19.

| Версия для печати |
© 2018 Methodology and History of Psychology