About
Issues
Our authors 
Library
Contact us
Forum
 
Znakov V. V., Sergienko E. A. (2018). Andrey Vladimirovich Brushlinsky: Life devoted to science

<< To the contents of the issue

JournalMethodology and History of Psychology Year2018 Issue2 Pages5–21
SectionThe Anniversary of A. V. Brushlinsky TypeScientific article DOI10.7868/S1819265318020012
CitationZnakov V. V., Sergienko E. A. (2018). Andrej Vladimirovič Brušlinskij: žizn', otdannaâ nauke [Andrey Vladimirovich Brushlinsky: Life devoted to science] // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Iss. 2. P. 5–21.




Andrey Vladimirovich Brushlinsky:
Life Devoted to Science


The paper reveals the meaning of A. V. Brushlinsky for psychological science. A brief biographical sketch of his life and his becoming as a methodologist, theorist, creator and organizer of the psychological science are presented. For almost half a century of the creative activity, he developed a theory of thinking as a prediction, explored the fundamental issues of methodology and history of psychology, the problems of artificial intelligence, the relationship of psychology and mathematics. He developed a continual‑genetic (nondisjunctive) method of studying a person as a subject. On the basis of this method, A. V. Brushlinsky created the theory of the subject and his sociality, distinguishing the social and the public; generalized the principle of determinism in relation to the social‑historical development of man. It is shown that A. V. Brushlinsky developed a holistic, original version of the subject's psychology, having formulated a subject‑activity approach. In his version of the psychology of the subject, in fact, history of the main problems of the Russian psychological science of the twentieth century, which for almost half a century of scholarly activity was in the focus of attention of Brushlinsky. These are the problems of the correlation of biological and social, conscious and unconscious, external causes and internal conditions in the determination of the mentality. The main principally new provisions of the psychology of the subject are singled out: a transition from a microsemantic to a macroanalytical method of cognition of the mentality has been accomplished; significantly expanded the idea of the content of activity as a determinant of the mentality; the system character of the investigation of the dynamic, structural and regulatory plans for the analysis of the subject's psychology is analyzed; the principal possibility of ambiguity in the subject's decisions of vital tasks is shown, in contrast to the idea prevailing before in Russian psychology of obtaining a new knowledge of the world only as a result of solving objective problems. The essence of the subject's psychology by A. V. Brushlinsky was described. A. V. Brushlinsky saw the perspective of psychological science in the development of the subject approach, in the transition from the psychology of mental processes to subject psychology, which requires considerable effort and time, consolidation of scientific efforts in solving this task of extreme complexity.

Keywords: subject‑activity approach; psychology of subject; principles of subject's psychology; prospects of subject's psychology


References
  • Abulkhanova K. A. (1997). Mirovozzrenčeskij smysl i naučnoe značenie kategorii subʺekta [The ideological meaning and scientific value of the category of the subject] // Rossijskij mentalitet: voprosy psihologičeskoj teorii i praktiki. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN. P.  6–74.
  • Abulkhanova K. A. (2005). Princip subʺekta v otečestvennoj psihologii [The principle of the subject in Russian psychology] // Psihologiâ. Vol. 2. N 4. P. 3–22.
  • Ananiev B. G. (1968). Čelovek kak predmet poznaniâ [Human as an Object of Knowledge]. Leningrad: Izd‑vo Leningr. un‑ta.
  • Brushlinsky A. V. (1968). Kul'turno‑istoričeskaâ teoriâ myšleniâ [Cultural‑Historical Theory of Thinking]. Moscow: Vysšaâ škola.
  • Brushlinsky A. V. (1979). Myšlenie i prognozirovanie: logiko‑psihologičeskij analiz [Thinking and Forecasting: Logical and Psychological Analysis]. Moscow: Mysl'.
  • Brushlinsky A. V. (1999). Psihologiâ subʺekta i ego deâtel'nosti [Psychology of the subject and his activity] // Sovremennaâ psihologiâ. Spravočnoe rukovodstvo / Ed. by V. N. Druzhinin. Moscow: Infra‑M. P. 330–346.
  • Brushlinsky A. V. (2000a). Gumanističnost' psihologičeskoj nauki [Humanism of psychological science] // Psihologičeskij žurnal. N 3. P. 43–48.
  • Brushlinsky A. V. (2000b). Deâtel'nost' subʺekta kak edinstvo teorii i praktiki [Subject activity as a unity of theory and practice] // Psihologičeskij žurnal. N 6. P. 5–11.
  • Brushlinsky A. V. (2001). O kriteriâh subʺekta i ego deâtel'nosti [On the criteria of the subject and his activities] // Psihologiâ subʺekta professional'noj deâtel'nosti. Moscow; Yaroslavl: DIA‑press. P. 5–23.
  • Brushlinsky A. V. (2002). O kriteriâh subʺekta [On the criteria of the subject] // Psihologiâ individual'nogo i gruppovogo subʺekta. Moscow: PER SÈ. P. 9–33.
  • Brushlinsky A. V. (2003). Psihologiâ subʺekta [Psychology of the Subject] / Ed. by V. V. Znakov. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN; Saint Petersburg: Aletejâ.
  • Brushlinsky A. V. (2006). Izbrannye psihologičeskie trudy [Selected Psychological Works]. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN.
  • Brushlinsky A. V., Temnova L. V. (1993). Intellektual'nyj potencial ličnosti i rešenie nravstvennyh zadač [The intellectual potential of the individual and the solution of moral problems] // Psihologiâ ličnosti v usloviâh social'nyh izmenenij / Ed. by K. A. Abulkhanova, M. I. Volovikova. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN. P. 45–56.
  • Čelovek, subʺekt, ličnost' v sovremennoj psihologii [Human, Subject, and Personality in Modern Psychology]. (2013). Materialy Meždunarodnoj konferencii, posvâŝennoj 80‑letiû A. V. Brušlinskogo [Proceedings of the International Conference dedicated to the 80th anniversary of A. V. Brushlinsky]. In 3 vols. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN.
  • Kharlamenkova N. E., Zhuravlev A. L. (2009). Psihologiâ ličnosti kak otkrytoj i razvivaûŝejsâ sistemy (k ûbileû L. I. Ancyferovoj) [Psychology of personality as an open and developing system (on the anniversary of L. I. Antsiferova)] // Psihologičeskij žurnal. N 6. P. 30–39.
  • Ličnost' i bytie: subʺektnyj podhod [Personality and Being: A Subject Approach]. (2008). Materialy naučnoj konferencii, posvâŝennoj 75‑letiû so dnâ roždeniâ člena‑korrespondenta RAN A. V. Brušlinskogo, 15–16 oktâbrâ 2008 g. [Proceedings of the scientific conference dedicated to the 75th anniversary of the birth of Corresponding Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences A. V. Brushlinsky, October 15–16, 2008] / Ed. by A. L. Zhuravlev, V. V. Znakov, Z. I. Ryabikina. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN.
  • Meleshko T. K. (2005). Kontinual'no‑genetičeskaâ teoriâ A. V. Brušlinskogo: roždenie idei [A. V. Brushlinsky's continual‑genetic theory: The birth of the idea] // Psihologičeskij žurnal. N 4. P. 98–104.
  • Meleshko T. K., Zhuravlev A. L. (2006). A. V. Brušlinskij – učenyj i organizator nauki [A. V. Brushlinsky, a scientist and organizer of science] // A. V. Brušlinskij. Izbrannye psihologičeskie trudy. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN. P. 5–21.
  • Poddiakov A. N. (2014). Komplikologiâ: sozdanie razvivaûŝih, diagnostiruûŝih i destruktivnyh trudnostej [Complicology: The Creation of Developing, Diagnosing and Destructive Difficulties]. Moscow: Izd. dom Vysšej školy èkonomiki.
  • Problema subʺekta v psihologičeskoj nauke [The Problem of the Subject in Psychological Science] (2000) / Ed. by A. V. Brushlinsky, M. I. Volovikova, V. N. Druzhinin. Moscow: Akademičeskij proekt.
  • Psihologiâ individual'nogo i gruppovogo subʺekta [Psychology of the Individual and Group Subjects] (2002) / Ed. by A. V. Brushlinsky, M. I. Volovikova. Moscow: PER SÈ.
  • Psihologiâ subʺekta i psihologiâ čelovečeskogo bytiâ [The Psychology of the Subject and the Psychology of Human Existence] (2010) / Ed. by V. V. Znakov, Z. I. Ryabikina, E. A. Sergienko. Krasnodar: Kubanskij gos. un‑t.
  • Selivanov V. V. (2003). Myšlenie v ličnostnom razvitii subʺekta [Thinking in the Subject's Personality Development]. Smolensk: Universum.
  • Sergienko E. A. (2011). Sistemno‑subʺektnyj podhod: obosnovanie i perspektiva [The system‑subject approach: Its grounds and perspective] // Psihologičeskij žurnal. N 1. P. 120–132.
  • Sergienko E. A. (2013). Problema sootnošeniâ ponâtij subʺekta i ličnosti [The problem of the relationship between the concepts of subject and personality] // Psihologičeskij žurnal. N 2. P. 5–16.
  • Subʺekt, ličnost' i psihologiâ čelovečeskogo bytiâ [Subject, Personality and Psychology of Human Existence] (2005) / Ed. by V. V. Znakov, Z. I. Ryabikina. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN.
  • Subʺektnyj podhod v psihologii [Subject Approach in Psychology] (2009) / Ed. by A. L. Zhuravlev, V. V. Znakov, Z. I. Ryabikina, E. A. Sergienko. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN.
  • Zhuravlev A. L. (2009). Kollektivnyj subʺekt: osnovnye priznaki, urovni i psihologičeskie tipy [Collective subject: main characteristics, levels and psychological types] // Psihologičeskij žurnal. N 5. P. 72–80.
  • Znakov V. V. (2007). Ponimanie v myšlenii, obŝenii, čelovečeskom bytii [Understanding in Thinking, Communication, and Human Existence]. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN.
  • Znakov V. V. (2016). Psihologiâ ponimaniâ mira čeloveka [Psychology of Understanding the World of a Man]. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN.

| Версия для печати |
© 2020 Methodology and History of Psychology