About
Issues
Our authors 
Library
Contact us
Forum
 
Akopov G. V. (2018). Psychology of art: from L. S. Vygotsky to V. F. Petrenko

<< To the contents of the issue

JournalMethodology and History of Psychology Year2018 Issue1 Pages34–45
SectionMethodology of Construction TypeScientific article DOI10.7868/S181926531801003X
CitationAkopov G. V. (2018). Psihologiâ iskusstva: ot L. S. Vygotskogo k V. F. Petrenko (transcendenciâ proektov psihologii iskusstva v različnyh modusah soznaniâ) [Psychology of art: from L. S. Vygotsky to V. F. Petrenko (transcendence of projects in psychology of art in various consciousness modes)] // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Iss. 1. P. 34–45.




Psychology of Art: From L. S. Vygotsky to V. F. Petrenko
(Transcendence of Projects in Psychology of Art in Various Consciousness Modes)


The article considers various projects of research directions in psychology of art. From L. S. Vygotsky's famous publication to one of the last works in this field, methodological foundations and theoretical features of various projects are examined. The analyzed projects correspond to a postulate of the complementarity of science and art with more or less specificity of the object, subject-matter and methods of the relevant research. The concept of "consciousness" is proposed as a universal category of psychological analysis of art phenomena and provides diachronic transcendence of art works' meaningful analysis and psychological research methods. The conceptual variations of the "consciousness" concept, for different projects under consideration, are revealed in the following word combinations: artistic consciousness, aesthetic, creative, communicative and other modes of consciousness, as well as the states of experience, comprehension and co-creation. The art sociality problem can be traced in a functional way, from L. S. Vygotsky's "social sensory technique" to the political and mass media manipulation of the "economic relationship of fiction and death" in modern social practices of the ancient Roman experience "revival" (V. A. Shkuratov). The dialectic of art direction historical cyclicality is confirmed: in the psychological dimension by change of the emotional dominant (empathy, catharsis) by the cognitive (ideal) dominant of values and meanings (V. V. Znakov, V. F. Petrenko, V. E. Semenov, N. A. Khrenov and others). In the recent research on psychology of art, unconscious can be organically included in the art work meaningful analysis (V. M. Allahverdov), as well as in the instrumental support of relevant studies (V. F. Petrenko). The psychosemantic equipment of research procedures determines the universality of corresponding methodological apparatus.

Keywords: art; psychology; artistic consciousness; projects by L. S. Vygotsky, V. P. Zinchenko, V. E. Semenov, V. M. Allahverdov, V. F. Petrenko; author of art work; text (product); reader (consumer); perception; understanding; interpretation; evaluation; art and freedom; communication; cyclicality; modernity


References
  • Akopov G. V. (2007). Faktory kontakta i svobody v obʺâsnenii âvlenij soznaniâ [Factors of contact and freedom in explaining the phenomena of consciousness] // Mat-ly I Vseross. konf. «Psihologiâ soznaniâ: sovremennoe sostoânie i perspektivy». Samara, 29 iûnâ – 1 iûlâ 2007 g. Samara: Naučno-tehničeskij centr. P. 13–15.
  • Akopov G. V. (2009). Klassičeskaâ i / ili neklassičeskaâ psihologiâ soznaniâ [Classical and / or non-classical psychology of consciousness] // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Iss. 1. P. 130–136.
  • Akopov G. V. (2010). Psihologiâ soznaniâ. Voprosy metodologii, teorii i prikladnyh issledovanij [Psychology of Consciousness: Issues of Methodology, Theory and Applied Research]. Moscow: Institut psihologii RAN.
  • Akopov G. V. (2011a). Globalizaciâ kak faktor transformacii soznaniâ [Globalization as a factor in the transformation of consciousness] // Vyzovy èpohi v aspekte psihologičeskoj i psihoterapevtičeskoj nauki i praktiki: Mat-ly V Meždunar. ežegod. naučno-prakt. konf. Kazan', 15–16 aprelâ 2011 g. / Ed. by S. V. Petrushin. Kazan: Otečestvo. P. 14–17.
  • Akopov G. V. (2011b). Obŝenie: urovnevaâ strukturaciâ [Communication: its level structure] // Psihologiâ obŝeniâ. Ènciklopedičeskij slovar' [Psychology of Communication: Encyclopedic Dictionary] / Ed. by A. A. Bodalev. Moscow: Kogito-Centr. P. 46.
  • Akopov G. V. (2013). Soznanie i vremâ: apologiâ mental'nosti i poètičeskogo soznaniâ [Consciousness and Time: The Apology of Mentality and Poetic Consciousness]. Samara: VEK#21.
  • Akopov G. V. (2017a). Napravleniâ i formy integracii psihologičeskih znanij v kontekste razvitiâ nauki [Trends and forms of integration of psychological knowledge in the context of the development of science] // Integrativnyj podhod k poznaniû psihologii čeloveka / Ed. by E. Yu. Korzhova. Saint Petersburg: RGPU im. A. I. Gercena. P. 87–107.
  • Akopov G. V. (2017b). Poèziâ kak kommunikaciâ: psihologičeskaâ ocenka poètičeskogo proizvedeniâ [Poetry as communication: the psychological assessment of a poetic work] // Aktual'naâ psihologiâ: naučnyj vestnik. N 1. Yerevan, Armenia. P. 273–279.
  • Allakhverdov V. M. (2000). Soznanie kak paradoks [Consciousness as a Paradox]. Saint Petersburg: DNK.
  • Allakhverdov V. M. (2001). Psihologiâ iskusstva. Èsse o tajne èmocional'nogo vozdejstviâ hudožestvennyh proizvedenij [Psychology of Art: The Essay on the Mystery of the Emotional Impact of Artworks]. Saint Petersburg: DNK.
  • Bakhtin M. M. (1994). Problemy tvorčestva Dostoevskogo [Problems of Dostoevsky's Works]. Kiev: Next.
  • Bratus B. S., Umrikhin V. V. (2011). L. S. Vygotskij i A. N. Leont'ev: ličnostnye osnovaniâ preemstvennosti idej [L. S. Vygotsky and A. N. Leontiev: the personal grounds for the continuity of ideas] // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Iss. 2. P. 5–17.
  • Dorfman L. Ya. (1997). Èmocii v iskusstve: teoretičeskie podhody i èmpiričeskie issledovaniâ [Emotions in Art: Theoretical Approaches and Empirical Studies]. Moscow: Smysl.
  • Ionesov V. I. (2011). Mul'tikul'turalizm kak integracionnyj process: model' transformacii [Multiculturalism as an integration process: a model of transformation] // Kreativnaâ èkonomika i social'nye innovacii. N 1. P. 60–65.
  • Khrenov N. A. (2005). Social'naâ psihologiâ iskusstva: perehodnaâ èpoha [Social Psychology of Art: The Transitional Epoch]. Moscow: Al'fa-M.
  • Lotman Yu. M. (2010). K postroeniû teorii vzaimodejstviâ kul'tur [Building a theory of interaction between cultures] // Semiosfera. Saint Petersburg: Iskusstvo-SPb. P. 603–614.
  • Petrenko V. F. (2010). Mnogomernoe soznanie: psihosemantičeskaâ paradigma [Multidimensional Consciousness: The Psychosemantic Paradigm]. Moscow: Novyj hronograf.
  • Petrenko V. F. (2011). Problema psihologii soznaniâ [The problem of the psychology of consciousness] // Psihologiâ soznaniâ: sovremennoe sostoânie i perspektivy: materialy II Vseros. nauč. konf. Samara, 29 sentâbrâ – 1 oktâbrâ 2011 g. Samara: PGSGA. P. 109–125.
  • Petrenko V. F. (2014). Psihosemantika iskusstva [Psychosemantics of Art]. Moscow: MAKS-Press.
  • Petrenko V. F., Suprun A. P. (2010). «Šinel'» Gogolâ: hristianskaâ pritča i buddijskij koan ["The Overcoat" by Gogol: Christian parable and Buddhist koan] // Obŝestvennye nauki i sovremennost'. N 2. P. 160–166.
  • Pozner R. (2015). Racional'nyj diskurs i poètičeskaâ kommunikaciâ: metody lingvističeskogo, literaturnogo i filosofskogo analiza [Rational Discourse and Poetic Communication: Methods of Linguistic, Literary and Philosophical Analysis]. Tomsk: Tomskij gosudarstvennyj universitet; Provinciâ.
  • Semenov V. E. (1988). Social'naâ psihologiâ iskusstva [Social Psychology of Art]. Leningrad: LGU.
  • Semenov V. E. (2007). Iskusstvo kak mežličnostnaâ kommunikaciâ (social'no-psihologičeskaâ koncepciâ) [Art as Interpersonal Communication (A Socio-Psychological Conception)] // Samara: Samarskij naučnyj centr RAN.
  • Semenov V. E. (2015). Polimental'nost' i social'nye cennosti sovremennoj rossijskoj molodeži [Polymentality and social values of contemporary Russian youth] // Psihologiâ soznaniâ: ètno-nacional'nye, religioznye, pravovye i regulâtivnye aspekty: mat-ly meždunar. nauč. konf. Samara, 15–17 oktâbrâ 2015 g., / Ed. by G. V. Akopov, E. L. Chernyshova, S. G. Ikhsanova. Samara: PGSGA. P. 276–280.
  • Shkuratov V. A. (2006). Iskusstvo èkonomnoj smerti. Sotvorenie videomira [The Art of Economical Death: Creation of the Video World]. Rostov-on-Don: Narradigma.
  • Vygotsky L. S. (2000a). Soznanie kak problema psihologii povedeniâ [Consciousness as a problem in the psychology of behavior] // Psihologiâ. Moscow: ÈKSMO-Press. P. 233–248.
  • Vygotsky L. S. (200b). Psihika, soznanie, bessoznatel'noe [Mind, consciousness, the unconscious] // Psihologiâ. Moscow: ÈKSMO-Press. P. 249–261.
  • Vygotskу L. S. (1987). Psihologiâ iskusstva [Psychology of Art]. Moscow: Pedagogika.
  • Yaroshevsky M. G. (1987). Vygotskij kak issledovatel' problem psihologii iskusstva. Posleslovie [Vygotsky as a researcher of the problems of the psychology of art. Afterword] // L. S. Vygotsky. Psihologiâ iskusstva [Psychology of Art]. Moscow: Pedagogika. P. 292–323.
  • Yurevich A. V. (2005). Psihologiâ i metodologiâ [Psychology and Methodology]. Moscow: IP RAN.
  • Zavershneva E. Yu. (2007). K publikacii zametok L. S. Vygotskogo [Comments on the publication of notes by L. S. Vygotsky] // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Iss. 4. P. 15–24.
  • Zinchenko V. P. (1994). Vozmožna li poètičeskaâ antropologiâ? [Is Poetic Anthropology Possible?]. Moscow: Rossijskij otkrytyj universitet.
  • Zinchenko V. P. (1998). Živoe znanie. Psihologičeskaâ pedagogika [The Living Knowledge: Psychological Pedagogy]. Samara: SGPU.
  • Zinchenko V. P. (2009). Mysl', slovo, obraz, dejstvie, affekt: obŝee načalo i puti razvitiâ [Thought, word, image, action, affect: the common origin and ways of development] // Metodologiâ i istoriâ psihologii. Iss. 1. P. 87–112.
  • Zinchenko V. P. (2010). Soznanie i tvorčeskij akt [Consciousness and Creative Act]. Moscow: Âzyki slavânskih kul'tur.
  • Znakov V. V. (2003). Ponimanie proizvedenij iskusstva [Understanding of artworks] // Psihologiâ iskusstva. Mat-ly Vseros. konf. Samara, 3–5 sentâbrâ 2002 g. Vol. 1. Pt. 1. Samara: Samarskij naučnyj centr RAN. P. 29–33.

| Версия для печати |
© 2022 Methodology and History of Psychology